![]() ![]() Fascist corporatism attempts to achieve state goals without sacrificing growth or dynamism, but at the cost of popular will, a massively violent state, epically awe-inspiring levels of corruption, and the gnawing terror of knowing that state-sponsored genocide is but a few pen strokes away. Command-driven communism writes off dynamism, instead aiming for stability and focused achievements. Socialism sacrifices growth at the altar of inclusivity and social placidity. Capitalism trades away equality to maximize growth, both economic and technological. Fascist corporatism: achievement of state goals with popular will, violent state, corruptionĮach model has its own pros and cons.Command communism: stability and focused achievement > dynamism.Socialism: inclusivity and social placidity > growth.Capitalism: economic and tech growth > equality.We’re headed toward a far more fragmented, low/no growth world. ![]() Zeihan argues that the relative world peace and economic growth since WWII were an exceptional period of human history that are now unwinding very quickly. I think Peter Zeihan’s The End of the World is Just Beginning came up during a conversation as an example of the kind of grand narratives / theories of everything that don’t quite do justice to the complexity of the world nevertheless, I read it, and enjoyed it. Zeihan // The End of the World is Just Beginning ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |